The best Discord analytics bots

The distinction that decides which bot you need

“Analytics bot” gets searched for two genuinely different questions. One is activity time-series: how many messages and how much voice time did this server generate this week, broken down by member and by channel, plotted over time. The other is event-outcome analytics: of the people who started an application or a ticket, how many finished, how long did review take, where did people drop off. They sound related and they are built entirely differently — a message counter and a funnel tracker share almost no code. Most readers searching “analytics bot” want the first, and it turns out to be a narrower market than the search volume suggests.

How this ranking was built, and what it is not weighted by

Every capability and price above was read from the vendor’s own site or documentation on 31 August 2026. The ranking weighs:

• Which kind of analytics it does — time-series activity, event-outcome, or growth-and-retention by source.
• Free retention window — how far back the free tier actually looks.
• Whether export is free, since a chart nobody can pull into a spreadsheet is a chart nobody reports with.

It is not weighted by install count, App Directory position, or marketing volume.

The comparison

Statbot — the uncontested leader on time-series depth

Statbot tracks messages, voice, activity, status and member count, and presents them as genuine time-series data: charts, heatmaps, a Member Drilldown page, a Channel Drilldown page, and a saved, shareable dashboard query bar. Nothing else in this comparison approaches that depth. The free tier’s window is 30 days, matching Invite Tracker and Koya independently — a clean, repeated number that marks where this whole market draws its free/paid line. Export is the paywall: CSV requires the Drilldowns upgrade specifically, not just any paid tier. Pricing is à la carte — $8.97/month for three upgrades up to $14.95/month for all five, and Statbot states plainly, in its own words, that it lacks joins, leaves and invites — “coming in the future.”

Invite Tracker — growth and retention by source

Where Statbot tracks activity, Invite Tracker tracks where members came from and whether they stayed — invite attribution, retained-member counts, and message activity broken down by invite source, alongside tickets, giveaways and welcome banners bundled into the same product. Free retention is 30 days, matching the category norm; CSV export is premium-only at €4.99/month, or €9.99/month for a white-labelled Custom Bot version. Nobody in this comparison combines Statbot’s activity depth with Invite Tracker’s source attribution — a server wanting both is buying both bots.

Vetox — the entire application funnel and every metric, free on Starter

Vetox’s analytics live in two places, and it matters to be precise about what each one is. Application Analytics is free on Starter and covers every metric and the full submission funnel — genuinely rare in its neighbouring category: of the ticket and application bots checked, exactly one competitor has anything comparable, covered below. Server Insights gives 3 free statistics channels (10 at Basic, unlimited at Max) showing live counts, plus free global and per-server leaderboards.

Statbot’s own category is the time-series half: no time-series activity analytics — no message or voice series over time, no member drilldown, no channel drilldown, no heatmap. That is a different product built for a different question, and a reader comparing the two directly would be comparing an event-outcome tool to a time-series one. The honest framing is that Vetox and Statbot answer different questions well, not that one beats the other at the same job. Vetox and Statbot compared directly works through what each free tier measures.

Tickety — the only other real application analytics found

Of the eleven ticket and application bots examined in this research, exactly one competitor ships real application analytics: Tickety, bundled into its wider ticket-and-application product. Its Pending Queue, Acceptance Rate and Average Review Time — including the share of applications reviewed within 24 hours — are the closest thing in this domain to Vetox’s free funnel, and it is worth naming plainly rather than implying Vetox stands alone in this specific capability.

ServerStats — a different product wearing a similar name

ServerStats deserves its own paragraph specifically because it gets compared to Statbot on name similarity alone, and the comparison is a category error. ServerStats renames voice channels to show live counts — by its own description, it updates roughly a million counters a day across its whole user base — with no historical series behind any of them. Its /data and /members commands appear to export without a paywall. It is a legitimate, useful product; it is simply not answering the same question as a time-series analytics platform, and treating the two as interchangeable would mislead a reader shopping for either one.

What nobody in this category combines

Statbot’s own documentation states plainly that it lacks joins, leaves and invites — activity without growth context. Invite Tracker has the growth context and no per-channel activity series. Vetox’s and Tickety’s application funnels both stop at submission outcomes and say nothing about server-wide activity. No product examined in this research combines time-series activity, invite-source growth and event-outcome analytics in one place — a server wanting all three today is combining at least two separate bots, and likely three.

Which one to install

Frequently asked questions

What’s the difference between activity analytics and application analytics? Activity analytics tracks server-wide behaviour over time — messages, voice, member counts. Application analytics tracks the outcome of a specific process, like a staff application or a ticket, from submission to decision. They answer different questions and are built by different products; Statbot does the first, Vetox and Tickety do the second.

How far back does free analytics usually go? 30 days, consistently, across Statbot, Invite Tracker and Koya — an unusually clean pattern for this category. Anything quarter-over-quarter typically requires a paid upgrade.

Can I export analytics data for free? Rarely for time-series data — CSV export is a paid upgrade on both Statbot and Invite Tracker. Vetox’s application-submission CSV export is free on Starter.

Does any analytics bot combine activity tracking with invite-source growth? Not among the products examined — Statbot covers activity and explicitly lacks invite data; Invite Tracker covers invite-source growth and has no activity time series. A server wanting both is running two separate bots.

Is ServerStats the same kind of product as Statbot? No — ServerStats shows live counts with no history, closer to a set of always-current channel labels than an analytics platform. Statbot builds genuine time-series data with drilldowns and charts. Comparing their feature lists directly produces a misleading result.

Does Vetox’s server insights include historical trends? No — Server Insights shows live statistics-channel counts (3 free, 10 at Basic, unlimited at Max) rather than a plotted history. For trend data over time, Statbot is the product built to answer that question.

Method

Every capability and price above was read from the vendor’s own site or documentation on 31 August 2026. Absence claims are scoped to the analytics-adjacent and ticket/application bots examined in this research.